Prince Andrew and Fergie, both 59 and divorced since 1996, are back in a romantic relationship that pals say makes them “friends with benefits”
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 49 | April 7, 2019 3:31 PM |
Great. I hope Andrew and Sarah remarry. And Charles can go fuck himself. He and Camilla are still pieces of shit. Fergie is a good ol' broad and always has been. Welcome back to the Duchess of York.
by Anonymous | reply 1 | April 6, 2019 9:28 PM |
Prince Charles thinking that Fergie brought shame and embarrassment to the Royal Family is a perfect example of the pot calling the kettle black.
by Anonymous | reply 2 | April 6, 2019 9:28 PM |
Sooner or later, one has to admit defeat.
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 3 | April 6, 2019 9:47 PM |
I hope they get back together officially. Forgiveness, and all that. It would be nice. I don't believe that Charles is against her. I think they're just doing it right. It took years for the public to warm to Camilla.
by Anonymous | reply 4 | April 6, 2019 9:48 PM |
If they remarry they won't have to testify against each other, right?
by Anonymous | reply 5 | April 6, 2019 9:50 PM |
This announcement just brought Prince Philip all that much closer to the beckoning grave.
by Anonymous | reply 7 | April 6, 2019 9:58 PM |
Makes sense. They drink together, nobody else wants them, congrats to them.
by Anonymous | reply 8 | April 6, 2019 10:01 PM |
If they want to marry, they'd better do it now while the queen is alive and Andy does not need the monarch's permission to marry (he's number seven in the line of succession and only the first six need the monarch's permission). When Charles comes to the throne, Andy will still be seventh once Harry's child is born, but if anything should happen to any of Charles's brood, Andy is back to number six and will need Charles's permission.
by Anonymous | reply 9 | April 6, 2019 10:02 PM |
I don’t think they ever properly broke up.
by Anonymous | reply 10 | April 6, 2019 10:02 PM |
Despite her less than dignified actions, Fergie has always been close to the royals. She remains a favourite of the Queen since Fergie was around the RF from a very young age.
by Anonymous | reply 11 | April 6, 2019 10:09 PM |
Hmm the Andrew - Jeffrey Epstein dirt must be coming out soon so they need a distraction for him.
by Anonymous | reply 12 | April 6, 2019 10:10 PM |
And her, too. She's involved, too.
by Anonymous | reply 13 | April 6, 2019 10:48 PM |
Charle's thinks Fergie brought embarrassment to the Royal Family? Well ain't that rich, coming from Mr. "I want to be your tampon" himself. His hypocrisy is palpable.
by Anonymous | reply 14 | April 6, 2019 10:57 PM |
Trying to sell access to her ex for £500,000 is something other than “less than dignified”.
by Anonymous | reply 15 | April 6, 2019 11:32 PM |
Except that was a private conversation, r14.
by Anonymous | reply 16 | April 6, 2019 11:39 PM |
In addition to Diana, who remains my favorite royal, Sarah is the best. She's got personality and pizzazz. And she does a lot of good work. Good to see she's nearly back. Now get married and make it official, duchess.
by Anonymous | reply 17 | April 6, 2019 11:58 PM |
They won;t do it while Philip is alive. They'll wait until he kicks the bucket, then quietly re-marry.
It's just like when Charles waited for his grandmother the Queen Mother to die before he married Camilla. She would have hated to have seen that, but he waited until she was barely cold in the grave.
by Anonymous | reply 18 | April 7, 2019 12:53 AM |
[quote]pals say makes them “friends with benefits”
More like "grifters with booze."
by Anonymous | reply 19 | April 7, 2019 12:55 AM |
[quote]In addition to Diana, who remains my favorite royal, Sarah is the best. She's got personality and pizzazz. And she does a lot of good work.
Bollucks! That tacky con artist only works for herself. She's always up to something. Trying to shake some money tree with some unseemly scheme. Dreadful creature.
by Anonymous | reply 20 | April 7, 2019 12:57 AM |
Read the article R18. Phillip no longer is against them getting back together. Sounds like he figures he'll be dead soon enough so why should he give a rat's ass what those two do.
by Anonymous | reply 21 | April 7, 2019 1:10 AM |
False! The are not getting back together
by Anonymous | reply 22 | April 7, 2019 1:13 AM |
It doesn't matter if Charles' comment to that hag about wanting to be her tampon was private or not. It was a vulgar comment made by a vulgar man and it became public knowledge. The fool should have known better than to say something like that over a phone line. I dare say most everything Fergie got into trouble about were not things she wanted to become public knowledge.
by Anonymous | reply 23 | April 7, 2019 1:17 AM |
Like toe sucking in public
by Anonymous | reply 24 | April 7, 2019 1:31 AM |
These stories are like those stupid "Queen Will Skip Charles and Make Wills King!" articles.
Just catnip for the fraus who collect royalty commemorative plates from the Franklin Mint.
by Anonymous | reply 25 | April 7, 2019 1:35 AM |
You mean all this time, we could have been friends?
by Anonymous | reply 26 | April 7, 2019 1:45 AM |
R23 you’ve never been in an intimate relationship, have you? People say things to their partners that they wouldn’t necessarily want to enter the public domain. It’s called being human, but I imagine that that isn’t something with which you’re very familiar, right?
by Anonymous | reply 27 | April 7, 2019 2:31 AM |
Sarah never looked lovelier.
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 28 | April 7, 2019 4:24 AM |
Just sing the song like they did in Hello, Dolly...the Duchess of York is back!
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 29 | April 7, 2019 4:27 AM |
[quote] Fergie has always been close to the royals.
Was the connection maintained through royal silverware?
by Anonymous | reply 30 | April 7, 2019 4:41 AM |
Both of them are lowlife white trash losers.
by Anonymous | reply 31 | April 7, 2019 4:54 AM |
I'm not sure if this is true but I read somewhere that they have a grift going between the two of them where Sarah sells access and gives Andy a cut, and that she can sort of get away with doing this because she is no longer an official member of the Firm.
So if that's true, then I would think that they will not remarry if only to keep her out of the Firm and in a position to keep the money flowing in
by Anonymous | reply 32 | April 7, 2019 5:04 AM |
How is she involved r13?
The guy at r3 is shaped and has the colour of a block of white cheddar cheese.
by Anonymous | reply 34 | April 7, 2019 5:10 AM |
I have no doubt Sarah cares for Andrew but she showers him with flattery to keep him in line. She is financially dependent on him and to some extent her daughter s who both have large trusts. She plays the victim around them to make them feel very protective of her. She knows exactly what she is doing and won't let another woman get too close to Andrew, even if both she and Andrew have dated other people over the years.
The undercover tape of her clearly selling access to Andrew and putting an envelope of money into her handbag said it all. I don't think she's a bad person but she reportedly has a spending problem and runs up large debts and likely felt desperate for cash.
She went on the D r Phil show years ago and he asked her about the "cash for access " incident and she got VERY indignant over the issue and insisted she needed money to help a friend. She is in absolute denial over it.
Both Sarah and Diana had mothers that walked out on their families. Diana's mother had an affair and left when Diana was 6 and moved to Scotland as the judge granted sole custody to Diana's father. Fergie's mother ran off with an Argentenian polo player and moved to Argentina when Sarah was 12 That had to have been emotionally traumatizing to both Diana and Sarah who were abandoned by their mothers.
by Anonymous | reply 35 | April 7, 2019 5:15 AM |
I would support them re-uniting.I liked them as a couple.Though i did side-eye Prince Andrew"s pedo scandal.I know their daughters would be pleased. Andrew and Sarah have issues that make them only perfect for each other apparently. Princess Beatrice today at a childrens charity mentioned them....i wonder if that was a nod to a possible reunion.The only person maybe unhappy about this would be Prince Philip....
by Anonymous | reply 36 | April 7, 2019 5:22 AM |
Just the thought of those two walruses mating...
by Anonymous | reply 37 | April 7, 2019 6:24 AM |
The queen was overheard telling Lord Porchester that she never felt motherly towards Andrew, he's clearly her least favorite child.
by Anonymous | reply 38 | April 7, 2019 6:34 AM |
[R38]
Wonder if its Andrews reputed sexual deviant behavior or is it because her Majesty tires of his spoiled rants for attention???
by Anonymous | reply 39 | April 7, 2019 6:58 AM |
The Queen was reputedly not very motherly towards Charles, and Anne was always Philip's favourite, so it can be presumed there wasn't as strong a bond between the Queen and Anne as between Anne and Philip. So if the Queen was overheard actually saying that she felt less than motherly toward Andrew, does that means the only one she felt motherly towards was Edward?
by Anonymous | reply 41 | April 7, 2019 7:15 AM |
Haven’t they been living together for a while now anyway?
by Anonymous | reply 42 | April 7, 2019 7:16 AM |
R41 you’re quoting R38 as fact. I know that this is Datalounge but just because someone types some words in a post quoting something that the Queen allegedly said in a private conversation more than eighteen years ago (Lord Porchester died on 9/11) doesn’t make it true. It’s most likely just something that someone made up. Unless R38 was a part of that conversation, which is doubtful.
by Anonymous | reply 43 | April 7, 2019 7:31 AM |
r43, If you notice, I did actually write "So if the Queen was actually overheard saying...". I acknowledged that it was unverified and was just thinking out loud based on a hypothesis (ie unproven theory). No need to panic.
by Anonymous | reply 44 | April 7, 2019 7:37 AM |
What “benefits” could 59-year-olds possibly have? Social benefits?
by Anonymous | reply 45 | April 7, 2019 7:43 AM |
Oh come on lets discuss Andrew and Sarah
The Markle conversations are now boring and unimaginative ....Sorry Carol Middleton trolls
by Anonymous | reply 47 | April 7, 2019 8:58 AM |
If they remarry, who in particular will have to bow or curtsey to her? Will Meghan have to crawl before her?
by Anonymous | reply 48 | April 7, 2019 9:06 AM |
[quote]The queen was overheard telling Lord Porchester that she never felt motherly towards Andrew, he's clearly her least favorite child.
Rubbish. By all accounts, Andrew is her favorite. Indeed, there were rumors that this is because he is the son of her one-time lover. I don't know if the latter is true, but the former is, by almost all accounts, true.
by Anonymous | reply 49 | April 7, 2019 3:31 PM |
ncG1vNJzZmivp6x7pa3TmqOorZ6csm%2BvzqZmraCimq6le5FsbG5sZ2WBbrzRoqWcnV2Wu6W%2BxLBkmqaUYrOmvsainGaakZi4bsDOoJytoJWn